answers. It often loves to explain the intricate scientific details, and in stereotypical form, is overloaded with expository dialogue. You can make up what you bad ap world essays essays want in a story, of course, but to explain so many things with such a handwaving answer is an insult to the audience. In Moore's "naturalistic SF" he wanted to keep the realism but eschew the over-explanation. He increased his focus on characters, saying that his mantra in concluding the show was "it's the characters, stupid.".
Great endings will sometimes finally make sense out of everything, or reveal a surprise that, in retrospect, should have been obvious all along. No bumpy-head aliens, no planet of the week, no cute time travel or episodes. "Astronomical" barely describes. Indeed, in general the idea that humans are the result of an Ark that landed in (relatively) recent history is both one of the most discredited ideas in the history of history, but also one of the most likely to resurface again and again because. Viewers would probably have excused this due to the circumstances. But he let this one, the biggest of all, stand.
Hinting essay megaessay
Many viewers were not aware (just as Moore wasn't) of who MTE was. It would have been nice to see her with Six and Baltar in New York (if we were to have that ending at all, of course) to show that she got a new, immortal angel existence. The show provided very few clues that it might be set in the past. No art on the walls of caves. The ending failed by both my standards (which dissertations on leadership you may or may not care about) but also his.